So most people that know me well enough know that I have a
very immature mind, I would love to blame it on my two sons; however, my mind
was that way since I do not remember when.
From the very beginning of Lady of Shalott it mentions Camelot. I instantly think, “Cool, there has got to be
some sword fighting or something because it has to deal with chivalry and the
Arthurian legends.” But oh yeah, I need
to refocus because I am reading for a class.
Okay, the young lady is in a tower surrounded by beautiful, natural scenery
in an area of agricultural workers. Then
I find out that she is not allowed to look upon anything but a mirror and her
weaving. She has been told that there is
a curse that will fall upon her if she looks upon anything else with her naked
eye.
So literally I try to think to myself maybe that is her
curse, a curse to never look upon anything for its brilliance. She will never see the true blue of the sky,
the deepest red of a rose or the deep greens of Kentucky Blue grass. She only gets to see the faded colors through
a mirror, an image that will never show the true brilliance because of the
constant glare. She will probably never
get to enjoy the smells either; if is not to look upon anything with her own
eyes that means that she will never get the chance to lie on her back in the
grass and next to the roses as she looks up to the sky. She is cursed to stay in the tower for the
rest of her days watching everyone else live their lives without her in
it.
So at that point I go back to being immature, I notice a
similarity to the movie Tangled. It is
only through her evil, fake mother that she is told the world is a cruel
place. That she is never to step foot outside
of her tower; it is only through her mother that says she is to look at the
world from her window and never to experience the “dangers” of the world. So
within the mixture of logic and imaginative explanations we have the actual
person that tells Lady of Shallot about the curse.
Then after coming back from the silly detour I want to bring
in Sir Lancelot. It seems as though Lady
of Shallot can tolerate her life without much, if any, human interaction. However, when someone as “fiery” as Lancelot
trots by with his horse things change.
Lady of Shalott seems to instantaneously be discontented with her life
so much as to look at the young knight.
She figures that the curse will either be broken or turn out to be non-existent. However, after the gleam of Lancelot’s horse,
armor, and hair have gone away Lady of Shalott realizes the curse is upon
her. She no longer sees the brightness
of any colors and everything seems to wither away to look like a dim, shadowy silhouette
of their original form.
I look at this as her virginity. Most young girls set intercourse onto a
pedestal of expectations. They want to
stay pure and a virgin, but constantly fantasize of how they will lose it and
how perfect the entire experience will be.
They build up their own anticipation for this glorious moment and when
it arrives they are sadly disappointed.
There is no instantaneous, deep connection and just left with a feeling
of sadness because they could have either saved that moment for someone else or
it was not what they made it up to be.
So many of the hopeful feelings are gone and all of the energy they
spent thinking of that moment was all-in-all wasted.
So I look at Lady of Shalott as horribly disappointed that
the moment was not able to last forever and the connection was not established
since Sir Lancelot was unable to return her love. She was left feeling empty and regretful that
she was not able to share the moment with her love. Since that feeling of love or lust was so
fleeting it left her unfulfilled and wanting more; however, she was unable to
make to wonderful Camelot before she pours out all of her emotions. So it leaves her dead as she floats down the
river.
Many others say that the moral of the story is keeping the
women in the household and out of the streets, but I think that it would be
closer to say it is about how women should be content with their lives and not
so hopeful for something more than what they have been given in life.
Given the Victorian context, do you think Tennyson intended for his reader's to see the curse as the loss of virginity? In other words, might that be a bit too sexually frank for readers of the time? It makes me wonder if Tennyson might have been referring to something less concrete, like the loss or reputation due to indiscreet behavior, or the loss of purity due to too much exposure to the larger world. There's certainly a conflict in this poem between the life embowered and life outside the tower for women, and your blog explores it in an interesting way.
ReplyDeleteInteresting post! I am glad that I am not the only one who read the word "Camelot" and instantly thought of swords and some action to be followed...not going to lie, I was slightly out of sorts when there wasn't any. :)Although it is still a great poem!
ReplyDeleteI like the vantage point you take, because I think that you have a good point in believing much of the Lady of Shallott's emotions and actions stem from the issue of sex. Especailly during modern times I could see how people would read this poem and conclude this as a theory. I had not thought of that and think it brings a great interpretation to the table about what Tennyson may have had in mind in his deliverance of the poem. Thank you for sharing this. :)